Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Actual proof of anything is hard to come by. I can't *show* you atomic particles but I can reasonably deduce they exist based on the behavior I can observe. People can deny the existence of anything if they just demand a high enough burden of proof that can never be met and throw deductive reasoning out the window. 

I called shenanigans and a few people were upset by that. If there really were no shenanigans, what are they upset about? Also my take on making a tough decision regarding a pet.

Don't you love it when people rebrand convincing you to think like they do by hiding certain negative facts and lauding other positive ones as 'educating' you? Seemed to me it was usually from people who had a personal stake in the outcome. Of course the whole point was to make it seem like your decision. What was that other word for it? I forget what it was. Oh that's right. We called it propaganda.

I'm no longer going to use Emerald viewer until they grow a sense of personal responsibility. It's a matter of principle.